American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 150, Issue 2 , Pages 199-204.e1 , August 2010

Macular Thickness Interoperator and Intraoperator Reproducibility in Healthy Eyes Using 7 Optical Coherence Tomography Instruments

,Accepted 11 March 2010.

References 

  1. Hee MR, Izatt JA, Swanson EA, et al. Optical coherence tomography of the human retina. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113(3):325–332
  2. Drexler W, Fujimoto JG. State-of-the-art retinal optical coherence tomography. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2008;27(1):45–88
  3. Wojtkowski M, Bajraszewski T, Gorczyńska I, et al. Ophthalmic imaging by spectral optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138(3):412–419
  4. Muscat S, Parks S, Kemp E, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of macular thickness measurements with the Humphrey OCT system. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43(2):490–495
  5. Paunescu LA, Schuman JS, Price LL, et al. Reproducibility of nerve fiber thickness, macular thickness, and optic nerve head measurements using StratusOCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(6):1716–1724
  6. Browning DJ. Interobserver variability in optical coherence tomography for macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137(6):1116–1117
  7. Polito A, Del Borrello M, Isola M, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of fast macular thickness mapping with stratus optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(10):1330–1337
  8. Danis RP, Fisher MR, Lambert E, et al. Results and repeatability of retinal thickness measurements from certification submissions. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(1):45–50
  9. Krzystolik MG, Strauber SF, Aiello LP, et al. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Reproducibility of macular thickness and volume using Zeiss optical coherence tomography in patients with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(8):1520–1525
  10. Browning DJ, Glassman AR, Aiello LP, et al. Optical coherence tomography measurements and analysis methods in optical coherence tomography studies of diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(8):1366–1371
  11. Sakamoto A, Hangai M, Yoshimura N. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography with multiple B-scan averaging for enhanced imaging of retinal diseases. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(6):1071–1078
  12. Wolf-Schnurrbusch UE, Ceklic L, Brinkmann CK, et al. Macular thickness measurements in healthy eyes using six different optical coherence tomography instruments. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(7):3432–3437
  13. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–310
  14. Legarreta JE, Gregori G, Punjabi OS, et al. Macular thickness measurements in normal eyes using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2008;39(4 Suppl):S43–S49
  15. Forooghian F, Cukras C, Meyerle CB, et al. Evaluation of time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in the measurement of diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(10):4290–4296
  16. Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN, et al. Comparison of macular thickness measurements between time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(11):4893–4897
  17. Chen TC, Cense B, Pierce MC, et al. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography: ultra-high speed, ultra-high resolution ophthalmic imaging. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(12):1715–1720
  18. Forte R, Cennamo GL, Finelli ML, Crecchio GD. Comparison of time domain Stratus OCT and spectral domain SLO/OCT for assessment of macular thickness and volume. Eye (Lond). 2009;23(11):2071–2078

 See Accompanying Editorial on page 138.

PII: S0002-9394(10)00229-1

doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.03.015

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 150, Issue 2 , Pages 199-204.e1 , August 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution