American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 150, Issue 2 , Pages 141-143, August 2010

Screening and Managing Eye Disease in 2010: An Asian Perspective

  • Nathan G. Congdon
  • ,
  • Mingguang He

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Mingguang He, Department of Preventive Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China

Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, State Key Ophthalmology Laboratory and Preventive Ophthalmology Unit, Sun Yat Sen University, Guangzhou, China

Accepted 13 April 2010.

Article Outline

 

Although Asian economies such as India and China are widely acknowledged now as global powerhouses, it nonetheless remains a fact that more than 60% of the world's blindness can be found in Asia.1 Asia has many advantages in combating blindness, including a high population density, generally good transportation infrastructure, and a relatively high ratio of eye care providers to the population compared with regions such as Africa. Asia has provided successful models for the delivery of high-volume, low-cost cataract surgery at facilities such as Aravind in India and Lumbini in Nepal. However, challenges remain. This article briefly reviews the state of screening and prevention efforts for major causes of vision disability in Asia, while outlining how resources may best be allocated to remedy these problems (Table).

TABLE. Challenges Facing Asia Regarding the Major Eye Diseases in 2010
DiseaseChallengesProgram/Research Needs
Cataract
Surgical quality

Resistance to skill transfer

Lack of patient knowledge about treatment


Improve training, including at residency level

Educational standards from government and organized ophthalmology

Information dissemination to persons with cataract

Refractive error
High and possibly growing prevalence

Lack of knowledge about benefits of glasses (including beliefs that glasses harm the eyes)

Poor spectacle quality


Proven, cost-effective strategies to improve wear

Improved spectacle quality through training and equipment

Safe and inexpensive primary prevention (practicality in question)

Diabetic retinopathy
Growing prevalence

Poor access to eye care among diabetics

Lack of knowledge about diabetes among doctors and patients


Training for internists on need to refer, and for ophthalmologists on how to treat

Interventions to improve long-term patient adherence with care

Glaucoma
Low rates of recognition and treatment

High risk of blindness for angle-closure glaucoma


Better case identification among patients already seeking treatment at clinics

Better training of ophthalmologists in diagnosis and treatment

Interventions to improve long-term patient adherence with care

In Asia, as in most other parts of the world, cataract remains the leading cause of blindness and impaired vision. Screening outreach efforts and low-cost, high-volume surgery are increasingly available in the region, and there are encouraging data suggesting that such outreach in fact can help to redress disparities in gender, income, and education with regard to surgical access.2 Nonetheless, problems with surgical quality remain, particularly in rural areas,3, 4, 5 and uptake of available services may be poor, with lack of knowledge remaining a crucial barrier.6 Skill transfer may be problematic in countries such as China, where the opportunities to learn surgery, particularly for younger doctors in rural areas, may be limited. Educational interventions are needed, aimed at informing patients about the treatability of cataract and at providing surgeons with the knowledge of how to screen, treat, and manage follow-up and complications. Further resources should be allocated for routine, organized screening outreach, either from hospital revenue, government funds, or communities themselves.

Asian countries have among the world's highest prevalence of children's refractive error, much of which may go uncorrected in rural areas.7 Although school-based vision screening and refraction programs are increasingly widespread in Asia, these interventions are encountering certain barriers to achieving their maximum impact. In China, for example, there is a widespread belief among children, their parents, and teachers that wearing glasses is harmful to the eyes.8 Research is needed to test the effectiveness of interventions to correct such beliefs and to promote spectacle wear.

Although some programs provide free spectacles to children with refractive error, others provide screening and prescriptions only, depending on locally available services to dispense glasses. Although this approach arguably may be more sustainable, it is dependent on the quality of locally produced spectacles. Recent studies in rural China suggest that as many as 50% of glasses currently worn by children are inaccurate by 1.0 diopter or more and that nearly 20% vary by 2.0 diopters or more.9 Although current therapies have some limitations, research into compounds that can retard axial elongation raises the possibility of primary prevention of myopia in parts of Asia such as Taiwan, Singapore, and Hong Kong, where prevalence is very high, provided that accurate strategies can be devised to screen for children at risk sufficiently early in life.

Diabetes is a growing problem in Asia, with significant increases in prevalence predicted for the large populations of India, China, and Indonesia.10 Studies in rural Asia have demonstrated that as few as 10% of persons with diabetic eye disease have been diagnosed and treated.11 Even in urban areas, as many as two thirds of diabetic patients in treatment may not be receiving optimal eye care, with lack of knowledge among both patients and physicians posing the major barrier.12 In a chronic disease such as diabetes, the challenge goes beyond simple screening and includes improving adherence with life-long care. Programs are needed using proven interventions such as intensive case management13 and novel ones such as financial incentives and lotteries14 to increase the proportion of diabetics in Asia regularly receiving sight-saving care. Better training, for internists about the need for diabetic eye care, and for ophthalmologists on how to provide such care, also is needed.

Glaucoma is a leading cause of blindness in Asia, as it is elsewhere in the world. This disease causes 10% of all blindness in India,15 for example, although only 10% of Indians with glaucoma have been diagnosed and treated.16 Glaucoma screening has posed a significant challenge to program planners, and even in the developed-world setting, such screening programs have not been considered cost effective.17 It seems that the most efficient strategy for glaucoma in Asia currently may be to optimize case finding among patients seeking treatment at clinics, potentially for other ailments such as cataract. This strategy will depend principally on improved training of physicians and other caregivers.18 As with diabetic eye disease, after the screening problem has been overcome, the challenges of promoting long-term adherence to therapy and short-term acceptance of surgery remain. Limited available evidence suggests that compliance with glaucoma treatments in Asia is equally as problematic in the developed world, if not more so.19 As noted above for diabetes, cost-effective strategies are needed to improve performance in this area.

Much progress has been made in combating unnecessary blindness in Asia since the inception, 10 years ago, of Global Vision 2020. As this program nears its midway point, we are challenged to increase our efforts as physicians, educators, and researchers. Sufficient knowledge about the prevalence, causes, and treatments of eye disease in Asia exists to reduce the burden of blindness there drastically. Disseminating this knowledge widely among patients and doctors will be a key step in moving from theory to practice. A more proactive stance toward screening outreach, committing resources, personnel, and organizational support, also is needed on the part of providers. Strong evidence indicates that patients in rural Asia are prepared to pay sufficient amounts for these services to make such efforts sustainable.20

Back to Article Outline

 

The authors indicate no financial support or financial conflict of interest. Both authors (N.G.C., M.H.) were involved in Design and conduct of study; Collection and management of the data; Analysis and interpretation of data; and Preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript.

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etyaále D, et al. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull WHO. 2004;82(11):844–851
  2. Zhang M, Wu J, Li L, et al. Impact of cataract screening outreach in rural China. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 12010;51:110–114.
  3. Murthy GV, Vashist P, John N, Pokharel G, Ellwein LB. Prevalence and vision-related outcomes of cataract surgery in Gujarat, India. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2009;16(6):400–409
  4. Zhao JL, Ellwein LB, Cui H, et al. Prevalence and outcomes of cataract surgery in rural China: the China 9-province survey. Ophthalmology. Forthcoming.
  5. Bourne R, Dineen B, Jadoon Z, et al. Outcomes of cataract surgery in Pakistan: results from the Pakistan National Blindness and Visual Impairment Survey. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(4):420–426
  6. Yin Q, Hu A, Liang Y, et al. A two-site, population-based study of barriers to cataract surgery in rural China. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(3):1069–1075
  7. Congdon N, Zheng MW, Sharma A, et al. Prevalence and determinants of spectacle nonwear among rural Chinese secondary schoolchildren: the Xichang Pediatric Refractive Error Study report 3. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(12):1717–1723
  8. Li L, Lam J, Lu Y, et al. Attitudes of students, parents and teachers towards glasses use in rural China. Arch Ophthalmol. Forthcoming.
  9. Zhang MZ, Lv H, Gao Y, et al. Visual morbidity due to inaccurate spectacles among school-children in rural China: the See Well to Learn Well Project, report #1. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(5):2011–2017
  10. King H, Aubert RE, Herman WH. Global burden of diabetes, 1995–2025: prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(9):1414–1431
  11. Wang FH, Liang YB, Zhang F, et al. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in rural China: the Handan Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(3):461–467
  12. Wang D, Ding X, He M, et al. Utilization of eye care services among diabetic patients in urban and rural China. Ophthalmology. Forthcoming.
  13. Gary TL, Batts-Turner M, Yeh HC, et al. The effects of a nurse case manager and a community health worker team on diabetic control, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations among urban African Americans with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(19):1788–1794
  14. Volpp KG, Volpp KG, John LK, et al. Financial incentive-based approaches for weight loss. JAMA. 2008;300(22):2631–2637
  15. Thulasiraj RD, Nirmalan PK, Ramakrishnan R, et al. Blindness and vision impairment in a rural south Indian population: the Aravind Comprehensive Eye Survey. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(8):1491–1498
  16. Dandona L, Dandona R, Srinivas M, et al. Open-angle glaucoma in an urban population in southern India: the Andhra Pradesh eye disease study. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(9):1702–1709
  17. Burr JM, Mowatt G, Hernandez R, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2007;11(41):iii–ivix–x,1–190
  18. Congdon N. Reducing the visual burden of glaucoma in Asia: what we know and what we need to know. J Glaucoma. 2009;18(1):88–92
  19. Sleath BL, Krishnadas R, Cho M, et al. Patient-reported barriers to glaucoma medication access, use and adherence in southern India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2009;57(1):63–68
  20. He M, Chan V, Baruwa E, Gilbert D, Frick KD, Congdon N. Willingness to pay for cataract surgery in rural southern China. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(3):411–416

PII: S0002-9394(10)00259-X

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2010.04.003

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 150, Issue 2 , Pages 141-143, August 2010