American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 150, Issue 5 , Pages 637-641.e1, November 2010

Scale for Photographic Grading of Vitreous Haze in Uveitis

University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida

Accepted 30 May 2010. published online 17 August 2010.

Purpose

To validate a scale for grading vitreous haze in uveitis using digitized photographs and standardized scoring.

Design

Evaluation of clinical research methodology.

Methods

Calibrated Bangerter diffusion filters inducing incremental decrements of spatial contrast were placed in front of the camera lens while photographing a normal eye to simulate vitreous haze. The photographs were digitized and an ordinal scale was created from 0 (none) to 8 (highest level of opacification at which fundus details could be seen). The scale steps correspond approximately to decimal Snellen visual acuities of 1.0, 0.8, 0.4, 0.2, 0.1, 0.04, 0.02, 0.01, and 0.002, with approximately 0.3 log step between each step. For validation, digitized fundus photographs of uveitis patients were displayed on a computer monitor for comparison with the standard photos. Three observers graded the test set twice under standard conditions. Interobserver and intraobserver variability and κ values for agreement greater than chance were calculated.

Results

Variance component analysis determined that 87.7% of the variance in grades was attributable to the test item rather than to grader or session. The intraclass correlation between graders and grading sessions varied from 0.84 to 0.91. Simple agreement within 1 grade between graders and sessions occurred in 90 ± 5.5% of gradings. κ values averaged 0.91, which is considered near perfect.

Conclusions

A 9-step photographic scale was designed to standardize the grading of vitreous haze in uveitis patients using fundus photographs. The scale is potentially adaptable to clinical trials in uveitis.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9394(10)00406-X

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2010.05.036

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 150, Issue 5 , Pages 637-641.e1, November 2010