American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 150, Issue 5 , Pages 701-709.e1, November 2010

Long-term Temporal Changes of Macular Thickness and Visual Outcome after Vitrectomy for Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane

  • Jongshin Kim

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • ,
  • Kyoung Min Rhee

      Affiliations

    • University of Adelaide Medical School, Adelaide, Australia
  • ,
  • Se Joon Woo

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
    • Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeonggi, Korea
  • ,
  • Young Suk Yu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
    • Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
  • ,
  • Hum Chung

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
    • Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
  • ,
  • Kyu Hyung Park

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
    • Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeonggi, Korea
    • Corresponding Author InformationInquiries to Kyu Hyung Park, Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 166 Gumiro Bundang-gu Seongnam Gyeonggi-do 463-707, Korea

Accepted 30 May 2010. published online 18 August 2010.

Purpose

To evaluate the long-term correlation of visual outcome and macular thickness after vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membrane and to identify prognostic factors for good visual outcome.

Design

Retrospective, observational case series.

Methods

We reviewed the records of 52 patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane who were treated with vitrectomy and could be followed up for more than 12 months. The main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness at baseline; at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery; and at the final follow-up visit. The correlation between BCVA and central macular thickness was analyzed and the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to obtain cutoff values for visual prognosis.

Results

Most of the changes in BCVA and central macular thickness took place during the first 3 months and reached a plateau at 12 months after surgery. Despite the lack of changes in BCVA after 12 months of follow-up, significant reduction in central macular thickness could still be observed over 12 months after surgery. The final BCVA was correlated significantly with preoperative BCVA and central macular thickness and early postoperative central macular thickness. Among them, the postoperative central macular thickness at 1 month showed the largest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Conclusions

Given the removal of the confounding effect of cataract, postoperative follow-up of 12 months may be sufficient to reach the final BCVA after surgery. However, more time is needed to achieve final central macular thickness. Because of the significant correlation between final BCVA and early postoperative central macular thickness, serial optical coherence tomography images in the early postoperative period were needed to predict visual outcome after epiretinal membrane removal.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9394(10)00408-3

doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2010.05.037

American Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 150, Issue 5 , Pages 701-709.e1, November 2010