Advertisement

The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography1

      Abstract

      PURPOSE: To evaluate single-field digital monochromatic nonmydriatic fundus photography as an adjunct in the screening of diabetic retinopathy.
      DESIGN: Prospective, comparative, observational case series.
      METHODS: Patients with type I and type II diabetes mellitus (n = 197) were sequentially evaluated by three different techniques: single-field digital monochromatic nonmydriatic photography; dilated ophthalmoscopy by an ophthalmologist; and seven Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) standardized 35-mm color stereoscopic mydriatic images. The seven stereoscopic color photographs served as the reference standard and were compared with either ophthalmoscopy or a single digital photograph transmitted electronically to a reading site. Levels of agreement were determined by κ analyses. The sensitivity and specificity of the three methods were compared based on a threshold for referral to further ophthalmologic evaluation (ETDRS level ≥35).
      RESULTS: There was highly significant agreement (κ = 0.97, P = .0001) between the degree of retinopathy detected by a single nonmydriatic monochromatic digital photograph and that seen in seven standard 35-mm color stereoscopic mydriatic fields. The sensitivity of digital photography compared with color photography was 78%, with a specificity of 86%. Agreement was poor (κ = 0.40, P = .0001) between mydriatic ophthalmoscopy and the seven-field standard 35-mm color photographs. Sensitivity of ophthalmoscopy compared with color photography was 34%, with a specificity of 100%.
      CONCLUSION: A single nonmydriatic monochromatic wide-field digital photograph of the disk and macula was more sensitive for diabetic retinopathy screening than mydriatic ophthalmoscopy, the currently accepted screening method. When adjudicated by standard seven-field color photographs, the higher sensitivity of digital photography primarily reflected the reduced sensitivity of ophthalmoscopy in detecting early retinopathy.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

        • National Society to Prevent Blindness
        Vision problems in the U.S.A. National Society to Prevent Blindness, Operational Research Department, New York1980
        • Klein R.
        • Klein B.E.K.
        Vision disorders in diabetes.
        in: National Diabetes Data Group. Diabetes in America diabetes data compiled 1984. US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD1985 (Chapter XIII)
        • Diabetic Retinopathy Study Group
        Photocoagulation treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy, the second report of Diabetic Retinopathy Study Findings.
        Ophthalmology. 1978; 85: 82-106
        • Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Group
        Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. ETDRS report number 1.
        Arch Ophthalmol. 1985; 103: 1796-1806
        • Javitt J.C.
        • Aiello L.P.
        • Chiang Y.
        • et al.
        Preventive eye care in people with diabetes is cost-saving to the federal government. Implications for health-care reform.
        Diabetes Care. 1994; 17: 909-917
        • Javitt J.C.
        • Aiello L.
        • Bassi O.J.
        • et al.
        Detecting and treating retinopathy in patients with type I diabetes mellitus, savings associated with improved implementation of current guidelines.
        Ophthalmology. 1991; 98: 1165-1173
        • Javitt J.C.
        • Aiello L.P.
        Cost-effectiveness of detecting and treating diabetic retinopathy.
        Ann Intern Med. 1996; 124: 164-169
        • James M.
        • Turner D.A.
        • Broadbent D.M.
        • et al.
        Cost effectiveness analysis of screening for sight-threatening diabetic eye disease.
        BMJ. 2000; 320: 1627-1631
        • Matz H.
        • Falk M.
        • Gottinger W.
        • et al.
        Cost-benefit analysis of diabetic eye disease.
        Ophthalmologica. 1996; 210: 348-353
        • Singer D.E.
        • Nathan D.M.
        • Fogel H.A.
        • Schachat A.P.
        Screening for diabetic retinopathy.
        Ann Intern Med. 1992; 116: 660-671
        • Moss S.
        • Meuer S.
        • Klein R.
        • et al.
        Are seven standard photographic fields necessary for classification of diabetic retinopathy?.
        Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1989; 30: 823-828
        • The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group
        Color photography versus fluorescein angiography in the detection of diabetic retinopathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial.
        Arch Ophthalmol. 1987; 105: 1344-1351
        • Schachat A.
        • Hyman L.
        • Leske M.
        • et al.
        Comparison of diabetic retinopathy detection by clinical examinations and photographic gradings.
        Arch Ophthalmol. 1993; 111: 1064-1070
        • Peters A.
        • Davidson M.
        • Ziel F.
        Cost effectiveness screening for diabetic retinopathy using a non-mydriatic retinal camera in prepaid health care setting.
        Diabetes Care. 1993; 16: 1193-1195
        • Lee V.
        • Kingsley R.
        • Lee E.
        • et al.
        Diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
        Ophthalmology. 1993; 100: 1504-1512
        • Jacob J.
        • Stead J.
        • Sykes J.
        • et al.
        A report on the use of technician ophthalmoscopy combined with the use of the Canon non-mydriatic camera in screening for diabetic retinopathy in the community.
        Diabet Med. 1995; 12: 410-425
        • Phillipov G.
        • Alimat A.
        • Phillips P.J.
        • Drew A.C.
        Screening for diabetic retinopathy.
        Med J Aust. 1995; 162: 518-520
        • Pugh J.
        • Jacobson J.M.
        • VanHeuven W.
        • et al.
        Screening for diabetic retinopathy.
        Diabetes Care. 1993; 16: 889-895
        • Griffith S.
        • Freeman W.
        • Shaw C.
        • et al.
        Screening for diabetic retinopathy in a clinical setting: a comparison of direct ophthalmoscopy by primary care physicians with fundus photography.
        J Fam Pract. 1993; 37: 49-56
        • Kalm H.
        Non-stereo photographic screening and long term follow-up for detection of proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
        Acta Ophthalmol. 1992; 70: 228-234
        • Taylor R.
        • Lovelock L.
        • Tunbridge W.M.G.
        • et al.
        Comparison of non-mydriatic retinal photography with ophthalmoscopy in 2159 patients.
        BMJ. 1990; 301: 1243-1247
        • Moss S.E.
        • Klein R.
        • Kessler S.D.
        • Richie K.A.
        Comparison between ophthalmoscopy and fundus photography in determining severity of diabetic retinopathy.
        Ophthalmology. 1985; 92: 62-67
        • Taylor D.J.
        • Fisher J.
        • Jacob J.
        • Tooke J.E.
        The use of digital cameras in a mobile retinal screening environment.
        Diabet Med. 1999; 16: 680-686
        • Liesenfeld B.
        • Kohner E.
        • Piehlmeier
        • et al.
        A telemedical approach to the screening of diabetic retinopathy.
        Diabetes Care. 2000; 23: 345-348
        • Marcus D.M.
        • Brooks S.E.
        • Ulrich L.D.
        • et al.
        Telemedicine diagnosis of eye disorders by direct ophthalmoscopy. A pilot study.
        Ophthalmology. 1998; 105: 1907-1914
        • George L.D.
        • Halliwell M.
        • Hill R.
        • et al.
        A comparison of digital retinal images and 35mm colour transparencies in detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy.
        Diabet Med. 1998; 15: 250-253
        • Henricsson M.
        • Karlson C.
        • Ekholm L.
        • et al.
        Colour slides or digital photography in diabetes screening—a comparison.
        Acta Ophthalmolog Scand. 2000; 78: 164-168
        • Lim J.I.
        • Labree L.
        • Nichols T.
        • Cardinas I.
        A comparison of digital nonmydriatic fundus imaging with standard 35-millimeter slides for diabetic retinopathy.
        Ophthalmology. 2000; 107: 866-870
        • Kerr D.
        • Cavan D.A.
        • Jennings B.
        • et al.
        Beyond retinal screening.
        Diabet Med. 1998; 15: 878-882
        • Bursell S.E.
        • Cavallervano J.D.
        • Cavallervano A.A.
        • et al.
        Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven stereo field 35-mm stereo photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy.
        Ophthalmology. 2001; 108: 572-585
        • Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group
        Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs—an extension of the modified Airlie House Classification. ETDRS report number 10.
        Ophthalmology. 1991; 98: 786-806
      1. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Classification of diabetic retinopathy. Detailed grading of stereo color fundus photographs. In: ETDRS manual of procedures. Chapter 18. NTIS PH85 223006/AS.

        • Diabetic Retinopathy Research Group
        A modification of the Airlie House classification of diabetic retinopathy. DRS report 7.
        Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981; 21: 210-226
        • Digital Diabetic Study Group
        Study protocol. Kaiser Permanente, Northern California1996 (February 12)
        • Fleiss J.L.
        Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. John Wiley, New York1981
        • Gardner G.G.
        • Keating D.
        • Williamson T.H.
        • et al.
        Automatic detection of diabetic retinopathy using an artificial neural network.
        Br J Ophthalmol. 1996; 80: 940-944
        • Cree M.J.
        • Olson J.A.
        • McHardy K.C.
        • et al.
        A fully automated comparative microaneurysm digital detection system.
        Eye. 1997; 11: 622-628
        • Basch C.E.
        • Walker E.A.
        • Howard C.J.
        • et al.
        The effect of health education on the rate of ophthalmic examination among African Americans with diabetes mellitus.
        Am J Public Health. 1999; 89: 1878-1882
        • Fowles J.B.
        • Rosheim K.
        • Fowler E.J.
        • et al.
        The validity of self-reported diabetes quality of care measures.
        Int J Qual Health Care. 1999; 11: 407-412
        • Jones D.
        • Hendricks A.
        • Comstock C.
        • et al.
        Eye examination for VA patients with diabetes.
        Int J Qual Health Care. 2000; 12: 97-104

      Further reading

      Members of the digital diabetic screening group