Advertisement

The Madurai Intraocular Lens Study I: A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Complications and Vision Outcomes of Intracapsular Cataract Extraction and Extracapsular Cataract Extraction With Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Purpose:

      The Madurai Intraocular Lens Study (MIOLS) was designed to compare safety, efficacy, and quality of life outcomes after either intracapsular cataract extraction with aphakic glasses (ICCE-AG) or extracapsular cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens (ECCE/ PC-IOL).

      Methods:

      The Madurai Intraocular Lens Study was a nonmasked randomized controlled clinical trial conducted at a single hospital. Thirty-four hundred patients with age-related cataracts and having a best-corrected visual acuity less than or equal to 20/120 in the better eye were randomly assigned to either of the two cataract operative procedures. The main clinical outcomes were safety (complication rates) and efficacy (bestcorrected visual acuity at 1 year equal to or better than 20/40. In addition, a subset of 1,700 trial participants received questionnaires before surgery, at 6 months after surgery, and at 1 year after surgery to measure visual functioning and visionrelated quality of life.

      Results:

      Details of study design, study organization, clinical and quality of life outcome variables, sample size calculations, patient eligibility criteria and recruitment, randomization and masking, participant flow, adherence to followup, quality assurance, and statistical methods are presented.

      Conclusions:

      The Madurai Intraocular Lens Study has sufficient power to detect clinically significant differences between the treatment options. There were no statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups for any of the major study variables at baseline. A high level of quality assurance was maintained throughout the October 1993 to June 1996 study period. The results should be applicable to all settings where the requisite expertise and resources are present.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Ophthalmology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Thylefors B
        • Negrel AD
        • Pararajasegararam R
        • Dadzie KY
        Global data on blindness.
        Bull World Health Organ. 1995; 73: 115-121
        • Venkataswamy G
        • Brilliant G
        Social and economic barriers to cataract surgery in rural South India. Visual Impairment and Blindness.
        in: December 1981: 405-408
        • Limburg H
        • Kumar K
        • Bachani D
        Monitoring and evaluating cataract intervention in India.
        Br J Ophthalmol. 1996; 80: 951-955
        • Stark WJ
        • Sommer A
        • Smith RE
        Changing trends in intraocular lens implantation.
        Arch Ophthalmol. 1989; 107: 1441-1444
        • Gupta AK
        • Ellwein LB
        The pattern of cataract surgery in India: 1992.
        Indian J Ophthalmol. 1995; 43: 3-8
      1. Use of intraocular lenses in cataract surgery in developing countries: memorandum from a WHO meeting.
        Bull World Health Organ. 1991; 69: 657-666
      2. Oxford Cataract Treatment and Evaluation Team. I. Cataract surgery: interim results and complications of a randomized controlled trial.
        Br J Ophthalmol. 1986; 70: 402-410
      3. Oxford Cataract Treatment and Evaluation Team. II. Use of a grading system in the evaluation of complications in a randomized controlled trial on cataract surgery.
        Br J Ophthalmol. 1986; 70: 411-414
        • Ferris FL
        • Kassoff A
        • Bresnick GH
        • Bailey I
        New visual acuity charts for clinical research.
        Am J Ophthalmol. 1982; 94: 91-96
        • Ellwein LB
        • Fletcher AE
        • Negrel AD
        • Thulasiraj RD
        Quality of life assessment in blindness prevention interventions.
        Int Ophthalmol. 1995; 18: 263-268
        • Fletcher AE
        • Ellwein LB
        • Selvaraj S
        • Vijaykumar V
        • Rahmathallah R
        • Thulasiraj RD
        Measuring vision function and quality of life in patients with cataract in Southern India: report of instrument development.
        Arch Ophthalmol. 1997; 115: 767-774
        • Cohen J
        Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.
        Revised edition. Academic Press, New York1977
        • Kazis LE
        • Anderson JJ
        • Meenan RF
        Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status.
        Med Care. 1989; 27: S178-S189
        • Prajna NV
        • Chandrakanth KS
        • Kim R
        • et al.
        The Madurai Intraocular Lens Study, II: clinical outcomes.
        Am J Ophthalmol. 1998; 125: 14-25